Kanye releases '30 Hours,' says he’s bringing back GOOD Fridays

Despite the impending release of The Life of Pablo, Kanye West isn’t giving up on G.O.O.D. Fridays. “30 Hours” is the latest release in the ongoing series, and features West giving us more bars than usual over a mellow beat. West hasn’t said how long he’ll keep the series going, but if releasing a full album doesn’t slow the releases down, we could be in store for new music from Kanye every week for the foreseeable future.

Now that the album is finally finished it’s back to Good Fridays. https://t.co/j5vq347xCC

— KANYE WEST (@kanyewest) February 12, 2016

Continue reading…

Go to Source
Author: Micah Singleton

Powered by WPeMatico

PSA: Steam's Latest Sale Ends Today

Steam’s Lunar New Year Sale is nearly over. The sale period ends today, February 12, at 10 AM PST / 1 PM EST, so you only have a few more hours to pick up games on the cheap.

“Thousands” of games are on sale, including Grand Theft Auto V ($40), Fallout 4 ($40), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ($30), Ark: Survival Evolved ($20), and Rocket League ($13).

Head to Steam’s website here to scan through the deals.

There, you’ll also find a short story that presents you with a series of choices. Initially, you’re asked to find a way either across or around a body of water, which translated to you picking to either swim or drive. Depending on your choice, you’ll be presented with games on sale that either involve water or driving.

What are you picking up? Let us know in the comments below!

Go to Source
Author: Eddie Makuch

Powered by WPeMatico

Chances of reaching the Philae lander are now 'close to zero'

It may be time to say goodbye to the Philae lander. Philae, which made a bumpy landing on a comet in November 2014, has not phoned home to the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission since July 9th, while engineers and scientists working on the mission today announced that the lander will soon face conditions “from which it is unlikely to recover.”

Continue reading…

Go to Source
Author: Colin Lecher

Powered by WPeMatico

Quantum Break Interview: “It’s The Most Ambitious Game We’ve Worked On”

Remedy Entertainment is aiming to create a perfect unison of video games and TV shows, a task many would say is both impossible and unnecessary. By its own admission the studio faces an uphill struggle, but believes the payoff could be huge: A new milestone for not one, but two mediums at their cultural peak.

The hurdles the Quantum Break team must overcome are numerous: deploying vast amounts of content over the internet, ensuring the episodes supplement the game in a valuable way, making it so those that choose to bypass it entirely still have a complete experience, to name a few.

We sat down with Quantum Break creative director Sam Lake, game director Mikael Kasurinen, and narrative designer Greg Louden, to discuss the various challenges it faces, how the studio has matured to rise to them, and the impact it believes Quantum Break will have.

GameSpot: In early interviews Sam Lake referred to Quantum Break as the “ultimate Remedy game.” What does that mean to you and, now that you’re close to going gold, do you still feel that’s accurate?

Mikael Kasurinen: I think he also said our best game is yet to be out there [laughs]. Of course, we’re always striving to get better, but I do think that Quantum Break is definitely the most ambitious, defining Remedy experience we’ve built so far.

Sam Lake: Of course saying something like that is tied to time and place. I feel this is our latest and greatest. Obviously we are so deep inside it that we can’t really see beyond it, so it’s impossible to objectively take steps back and look at it. Ultimately it will be decided by the gamers.

A lot of raw passion went into Max Payne. We were kids so we couldn’t really analyse it or truly make calculated choices when developing that, there was no experience there. In some ways Alan Wake was also that, we just poured our hearts into it. With Quantum Break I feel like we took a couple of steps back and asked ourselves what a Remedy game is. We looked at what our strengths are and what the criticisms towards Alan Wake were, if there were any.

At that stage we made certain choices and decisions consciously. On the action side, for example, we said let’s make sure gameplay caters for as wide an audience as possible. Let’s take inspiration from Hollywood’s summer blockbuster movies when it comes to the accessibility and the speed of the action.

We took the learnings on storytelling and pacing that we got from Alan Wake and put it to use, but also went further with it. As developers and creators of games, we took a slightly more grown up approach to it by figuring it out. We used a formula we’ve been iterating and perfecting to make the best game we can. That was the thinking and maybe that’s where the “ultimate Remedy game” comes from. Ultimately, it’s a journey, and after this there will be further games, but yeah.

How would you describe Quantum Break to someone who isn’t familiar with it? On top of being a time-travel story, it also feels like a superhero story.

Kasurinen: There’s definitely similarities. We have a character that gains these amazing powers and the ability to manipulate time. It’s also a disaster movie where time breaks at the beginning and everyone is scrambling to figure out how to stop that from escalating. All of those different things are part of the experience.

We have a complicated story. It’s time travel after all, and those are always paradoxical and complicated, but it all makes sense and is explained. This is the most ambitious game I’ve worked on. The multiple themes all create something quite unique, which is why I kind of recoil when it’s simplified to “a sci-fi story.” Modern TV shows are really difficult to categorise, some people could say Game of Thrones feels authentic, but it’s clearly pure fantasy. There’s elements of it that make it seem real and relatable. I’d like to imagine Quantum Break does that too.

Doing a purely story-focused thing really doesn’t feel triple AAA

Sam Lake

As a studio you’re great at creating worlds and telling stories, yet you always return third-person shooting. Why is that genre the best vehicle for your narrative ambitions? I’d expect you’d gravitate towards the Telltale style of episodic games.

Lake: First of all, never say never. Who knows what the future will bring and what our next project will be. At the same time I feel part of the reason for that genre choice is the size of the game. If we are making a AAA experience, doing a purely story-focused thing really doesn’t feel triple AAA. You’re talking about focusing on a certain aspect [there].

That’s part of where the action side of it comes in, as it is part of the AAA feel. Obviously we also have a lot of talent and experience for creating [third-person shooters]. We can make that really engaging and exciting because of that.

Third-person has always felt like the way to go with the characters we make. It fits into the idea that we have a very strong main character that you always see on the screen. It’s part of the storytelling to see him move and be there at the centre of everything. From Max Payne on it just suited the kind of character development and character-focused stories we are doing.

People always talk about the overall feel of the world in Remedy Games. The noir grit of Max Payne, for example, and the tension of Alan Wake. Is that strong sense of atmosphere and world identity there in Quantum Break?

Lake: I think so and I definitely hope so. There has been a very conscious effort to make sure the world feels like a character and always is. From the story perspective I always look at it as the internal conflict of the main character becoming the external conflict and state of the world.

Max Payne has horrible stuff going on inside him and then outside it’s the worst winter storm in a century on a really dark, gloomy night. And it’s always night, it’s never day in the first two Max Payne games. It’s almost like this guy hasn’t seen the sun since his family was murdered. Alan Wake was going through an identity crisis, plus problems with his marriage and his work. That turned into a supernatural threat in the world.

In Quantum Break it’s maybe not quite as direct, because this game isn’t called Jack Joyce. We have the show side of it [looking at other characters] and you get to play the bad guy as well, so there’s more of a TV series-like ensemble cast in it. At the same time it’s still about Jack’s personal life. He has a troubled relationship with his only family, his brother. Then his best friend turns out to be his worst enemy.

If you go back to the themes of all of our games you’ll notice they are about personal struggles to keep families together. For Max, it’s a lost cause but he’s on a path of revenge for them. In Alan Wake, he has problems he’s trying to work through by rescuing his wife. For Jack in Quantum Break we have a broken family to start with, but maybe there’s something that he has misinterpreted and it’s still worth saving. It’s a crisis he’s trying to fix, and at the same time there’s an external threat in that time is breaking down.

Click image to view in full screen

Do you worry the nuances of the story may be lost under the complexities of a time travel story?

Lake: For us, the model is a season of a TV series. If you think about ensemble casts and plot threads in a good TV series, there’s room for quite a bit in there. In a game there is this side of exploration to it and optional story in it, so you can discover aspects of the mystery while taking your time. I like the idea that Quantum Break can be enjoyed as just an explosive action romp, but then those that want to immerse themselves in the world can do that.

It’s a very Breaking Bad approach. That show left subtle clues for people to latch onto. Was that an influence, and if not, what was?

Lake: It’s a time travel story so we have echoes of classics like Back to the Future and Terminator. Relatively recently there’s been a surprising amount of time travel. Interstellar had an aspect of it, X-Men: Days of the Future Past had it, and so did Looper. There was quite a bit of time when time travel wasn’t a thing that people were using.

I love modern TV. Fargo season two was the latest show I watched and really loved the quirkiness of it. I take more inspiration from TV on pacing and structure, along with how characters and plot twists are handled. Working on stories all my life certain things become predictable and formulaic, but with modern TV you have absolutely no idea what’s coming. The best shows are the ones you watch and say “I have no idea who’s going to survive and what’s going to happen.”

It’s wonderful because it’s liberating, it frees you from analysing it too much. We’re definitely drawing from that. Of course there’s certain modern sci-fi things like Inception and things like that too. I don’t know what the right term for them is, but we like material that is grounded in real life and present day but still have that sci-fi layer.

If you go back to the themes of all of our games you’ll notice they are about personal struggles to keep families together

Sam Lake

Kasurinen: Previous games have been very directly focused on one single idea, Alan Wake for example on a Stephen King type story, and Max Payne is hardboiled cop. Quantum Break is difficult to place like that. We’re trying to tell a modern story with the feeling of the best HBO shows, like True Detective and Game of Thrones.

Stories in games tend to be quite complicated when you factor in player choice, so adding a TV show element on top of that and trying to connect it using time travel sounds like quite the task. Greg, you come from a movie background, how has it been joining that world with the world of video games?

Greg Louden: In film I worked in visual effects and more of the animation stuff, but I’ve always made films for fun. I live films, cinema, games, and music. So for me, connecting it all was just natural, the tools I learned in film all came across. I do feel like games is one of the best ways to tell a story because you can add in so much content whereas with a film you sit down for two hours, have a great experience, and learn everything, but you can’t stop and read what’s on the wall, or make decisions that change things.

Has it been easier to reach that goal of furthering storytelling by creating the game alongside an actual TV show? The worry is that when games are adapted into movies, they include touchstones for fans and the experience is worse off because of it. A lot of fans might have similar concerns for Quantum Break’s show.

Kasurinen: That’s a good point. I think it’s kind of short-sighted to think that the same ideas and tricks will work on movies, TV shows, and games. They require different talents and experiences and focus on the right things to make them each a compelling experience. The key thing in Quantum Break is how we’re first and foremost thinking of it as a game. That’s an important thing to say out loud. It’s an experience made for people who love playing games. But we’re also taking elements of high-quality TV and weaving them into each other.

The things that you do in the game have an impact on the TV show side. You actually play the villain, who is the main star of the show, and you make decisions that have an impact in the game. You’ll see small things that are slightly different because of what you did. These are built together and in total create an experience that is larger than the sum of the parts. They’re made to work together.

Having a TV show seems to help give weight to moments in action games that devs want to be poignant, but usually don’t because of the nature of action games and the pace they move at—the death of a supporting character for example.

Kasurinen: Absolutely. I think it’s one of the solutions to that problem. I totally understand what you’re talking about, there’s a frame of mind that people go into when they’re playing a game. They want to focus on playing, they want to control the characters, they want to interact with the world. A big problem in games when you try to convey the nature of a character is the player wants to have control, so it’s very hard to have the information there while the player is running around. TV and movies truly let people understand a character as they give them breathing room. People are in a more passive frame of mind where they look at what’s presented, so they can assimilate information and internalise it. That is a good way of making people understand who the characters are and making them relatable.

Do you think the gaming audience is open to being passive in that way? Metal Gear Solid 4, for example, heavily relied on the player absorbing narrative like that and it didn’t go over well.

Kasurinen: I agree there is a problem there and I think that was an attempt to combine these two different worlds, but maybe not in the most effective way. It’s a tough goal, and figuring out how these two elements work together is not easy. There’s definitely going to be built in resistance towards it based on the experiences people have had. I’m sure there’s going to be a lot of blanket statements that it’s too passive and so on-but I do wish people would give it a chance and at least watch the first episode. That will help them understand what we’re trying to do and why. I think what we are trying is definitely interesting and different. I don’t think anybody has done what we are doing right now, where we so carefully combine these two things. But I do agree with you, it feels to many people as an unnecessary element, but it’s not. It’s a part of the whole that gives you the best possible understanding of who is doing what and why through experiencing everything.

The key thing in Quantum Break is how we’re first and foremost thinking of it as a game. That’s an important thing to say out loud

Sam Lake

MGS4’s mistake was the big imbalance between watching and playing. Is Quantum Break a complete, well-rounded experience even without the TV show element?

Kasurinen: When I spoke to you earlier about the maturity and so on, I should have also said it’s not black and white, where we show good guy doing good and evil guy doing evil. There’s reasons behind his actions and nuance behind his intentions that can’t be easily encapsulated in short cinematics. I feel like when you understand that, the way you interact with the characters from the show in the game becomes more meaningful and gratifying.

In terms of concluding the story, is there a resolution for both characters? We get to make decisions and spend time exploring the motivations of the villain, will we get a resolution for his story?

Louden: Yes I think you will. We have one ending for the game, but your choices definitely impact what that looks like. You can play the game in an evil way and you get different cinematics and other characters are different because of that. Serene–the antagonist–for example, can be twisted by your actions, and can become more and more twisted as you go on. That’s what I like, usually it’s “there’s the bad guy, you’re the good guy.” But our game is always throwing whether he is a bad guy into question, You’re reading emails and notice he’s doing things similar to what Jack is and that may spark an idea in your mind about what he’s doing and why. And you can replay the game, do it all again, and see that different side of him.

Given the investment, the technology and the effort to establish a world, can we expect more stories to be told within this universe in the future?

Kasurinen: We approach every game we build in a way that it feels like a universe that we can easily expand and build more products on top of. But at this point in time we’re focusing on getting Quantum Break done and have no further plans beyond that.

Have you thought about delivering new content through the TV show. Extra episodes after the fact?

Kasurinen: From our perspective it’s definitely a natural thing, but at this point in time we’re still all focused on Quantum Break we have now.

Go to Source
Author: Tamoor Hussain

Powered by WPeMatico

How Super Mario became an unlikely RPG star

In the mid-’90s Nintendo entered into an unlikely partnership. The company known for Super Mario Bros. and The Legend of Zelda teamed up with Squaresoft (now Square Enix), the developer behind the Final Fantasy series of dense role-playing games. The goal was simple: to extract the gameplay and structure of an RPG like Final Fantasy, and inject it into the light hearted universe of Mario. It worked! Super Mario RPG not only became a cult hit following its release 1996, but spawned two different Mario-themed role-playing series, with Paper Mario and Mario & Luigi.

Like their predecessor, the two series have been critical and cult hits over the years, combining lighthearted humor with a familiar setting and a handful of inventive twists…

Continue reading…

Go to Source
Author: Andrew Webster

Powered by WPeMatico

Deadpool's Best Battles

Each week we normally take a look at some of the most violent and brutal fights in new comics. Unfortunately Deadpool came to us and insisted we focus on some of his best battles in comics. Are these his absolute best battles? We’ll let you argue with Deadpool if you don’t agree.

Deadpool: Suicide Kings

Deadpool was lured by a rich kid to Newark.

Because the kid had a huge gambling problem and owed a lot of money, he needed Deadpool to kill his bookie. Deadpool agrees because he’d end up making a million dollars in the end. It turned out it was all a trap. The kid and Tombstone set Deadpool up and released doctored footage showing him blowing up an apartment building. This put the Punisher on Deadpool’s trail.

Punisher disguised himself as a pizza delivery guy in order to get close to Deadpool. Just as he was about to deliver the final blow, Daredevil came to Deadpool’s rescue, knowing that Deadpool was innocent.

As Deadpool escaped to try to clear his name, Punisher later caught up with him again.

You would think shooting Deadpool’s head off would take care of him. Thanks to his healing factor, he managed to survive. Now with Daredevil and Spider-Man helping him, clearing his name should be easy, right?

Punisher finds Deadpool alone yet again, and the two continue their fight.

Eventually, Deadpool convinces Punisher he’s innocent–or at least innocent in this matter. They team up in order to take on Tombstone and his men.

There’s plenty of more fighting, and you know eventually everything will get settled nice and neatly.

Wolverine Origins: The Deep End

A mysterious man offers to pay Deadpool $20 million dollars to kill Wolverine. How could Deadpool turn down that offer? Deadpool tracks down the mutant and starts things off with dropping a piano on top of Logan.

The fight gets intense. At one point, Deadpool is about to shoot Wolverine at point blank. It’s a good thing for Logan he has those really sharp Adamantium claws.

With his fingers cut off, it might be a little difficult for Wade to continue the fight. He is a pretty resilient guy. He stalls long enough for his healing factor to allow his fingers to grow back.

That bullet obviously doesn’t stop Wolverine.

Just as Deadpool comes close to finally killing Wolverine, Logan’s estranged son, Daken, pops in and catches Deadpool off guard. This was actually part of the overall plan, and Deadpool was just used to get Daken to show up when Wolverine was close to death because he wouldn’t want anyone else to kill his father besides him.

Wolverine does make it clear what would happen to Deadpool if he tried killing him again.

Threatening to chop him up and eat him, Wolverine’s final words are, “Like to see ya come back from that…” Deadpool thinks to himself he easily could, just like bad Mexican food.

Deadpool Kills the Marvel Universe

Deadpool actually kills the Marvel Universe. He takes on all the heroes and villains. Before you start to worry about this marking the end of all Marvel comics, the story does sort of take place in an alternate universe.

Professor X and the X-Men bring Deadpool to get treatment and therapy for his behavior. Unfortunately the psychiatrist in charge was really the villain from the Microverse, Psycho-Man. His attempt to gain control over Deadpool so he could build an army of unstoppable soldiers backfired. All it did was unleash Deadpool’s true evil side.

His first stop was the headquarters of the Fantastic Four. Killing Reed Richards and the Human Torch, the Invisible Woman had no choice but to create an invisible bubble inside his head and expand it.

Sue Richards isn’t a killer. Having witnessed the murder of her husband and brother, she was left with no choice. It’s too bad she turned her back on Deadpool’s body as his head regrew. He followed this by killing her as well.

Later Spider-Man finds Deadpool. He’s pretty disgusted with the merc’s actions and drops him on a car. As he goes to Deadpool and starts yelling at him. Looks like he ignored his Spider-sense because this allowed Deadpool to take care of him.

Deadpool next takes out the Avengers by stealing some Pym Particles and placing several bombs inside their mansion, including in their coffee. He moves on the X-Men and starts taking them down.

Using a sword made of Carbonadium, Deadpool is able to kill Wolverine. Carbonadium is a metal similar to Adamantium and affects a mutant’s healing factor.

Deadpool continues to kill heroes and villains. When it appears there’s no one left to kill, he manages to get transported to the reality where the Marvel writers are meeting and discussing the series. It’s not going to go well for them.

Deadpool #250, (AKA #45)

Deadpool tends to make a lot of enemies. After a couple fights with the terrorist organization, ULITMATUM, their leader decides to go after the home where Deadpool’s daughter lives.

Knowing he needs to put a stop to this, he finds the perfect location to stage a final battle. ULTIMATUM comes in full force but Deadpool has had time to prepare for them.

Deadpool has his hands full. ULTIMATUM didn’t take any chances. They put a huge bounty on Deadpool’s head which causes other killers to come out of the woodwork.

Wade finally confronts Flag Smasher, who begs Deadpool not to kill him now that he realizes just how serious of a threat he can be.

Even though he’s taken care of their leader, he can’t let the rest of ULTIMATUM run free. Not when the life of his daughter is at risk.

Knowing that even wiping out all these soldiers won’t be enough, Deadpool feels there’s only one thing left. Deadpool must die.

The world needed to believe Deadpool was dead.

Everything seemed right, but then the world ended due to the events of Secret Wars. That’s okay because the world was later recreated, and Deadpool was happier than ever.

That’s all the time we have for this week. If there’s a Deadpool battle you thought was way better than any of these, let us know which one in the comments below!

Go to Source
Author: Tony Guerrero

Powered by WPeMatico

First Click: Hyperloop or loopy hype?

Elon Musk famously described Hyperloop as “a cross between a Concorde, a rail gun… and an air hockey table.” He first floated his idea for the high-speed ground transportation system in July 2012, and then again in May 2013 at the D11 conference. In August of 2013, Musk followed up his musings with a 58-page plan that laid out the fundamentals for Hyperloop Alpha, a tube designed to shoot aluminum pods carrying passengers and vehicles from LA to San Francisco at speeds of up to 800mph. That’s fast enough to cover the entire 380 mile trip from Los Angeles to San Francisco in 35 minutes.

“If it was my top priority, I could probably get [a working prototype] done in one to two years,” said Musk at the time. “But it’s going to be pretty far…

Continue reading…

Poll
When will a Hyperloop connect two major cities like LA and San Francisco?






  133 votes | Results

Go to Source
Author: Thomas Ricker

Powered by WPeMatico

Will Smith is "Definitely Doing" Bad Boys 3

Before the release of Bad Boys in 1995, Will Smith was best known for music career and TV work. The Michael Bay-directed action thriller turned Smith into a movie star, and its 2003 sequel Bad Boys 2 was also a big hit. A third film has been on Sony’s schedule since last year, and now both Smith and director Joe Carnahan have hinted strongly at their involvement.

In an interview with BBC Radio One this week, Smith mentioned that he had recently seen his Bad Boys co-star Martin Lawrence. “I saw Martin a few weeks ago,” he said, via Complex. “I haven’t seen him for about two years. We just looked at each other. We hugged. In that moment, we knew we were making another Bad Boys. We’re definitely doing another one.”

A-Team director Carnahan has been rumoured to be in line to helm the film for a few months, and yesterday he tweeted some pre-visualisation artwork that seemed to confirm this:

…who is this man?
…and how bad is he? #BadBoys3 pic.twitter.com/3i3a5bCEwJ

— Joe Carnahan (@carnojoe) February 11, 2016

Bad Boys 3 currently has a release date of February 17, 2017, with a fourth movie pencilled in for July 3, 2019.

Go to Source
Author: Dan Auty

Powered by WPeMatico